<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Hardware Category: Digital Rebellion Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/cats/14</link>
    <description>Posts about Hardware</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:59:13 MST</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:59:13 MST</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>DigitalRebellion.com</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Recently updated AppleCare docs - 5/1/09</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/recently_updated_applecare_docs__5109.html</link>
      <description>Here are the most recent AppleCare docs relevant to ProApp users, or ones that I found generally useful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Hardware&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2110&quot;&gt;Xserve: USB, FireWire, and optical drive do not respond&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2377&quot;&gt;MacBook Pro: Distorted video or no video issues&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2842&quot;&gt;Can't connect two DVI connectors to Power Mac G5 (Late 2005), Mac Pro (Original), and Mac Pro (Early 2008) video cards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3516&quot;&gt;Xserve (Early 2009): Use the latest version of Server Admin Tools&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2836&quot;&gt;Mac Pro: Power consumption and thermal output (BTU) information&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2773&quot;&gt;Xserve (Late 2006 and later): Configuring Lights-Out Management (LOM)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3508&quot;&gt;Xserve (Late 2006 or later): How to configure Server Monitor to access Xserve&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3513&quot;&gt;Xserve (Early 2009): Power consumption and thermal output (BTU) information&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2315&quot;&gt;Certain optical digital audio source sample rates may not work for some Intel-based Macs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Final Cut Pro / Express&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2948&quot;&gt;Final Cut Express: Camcorder support&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2703&quot;&gt;Final Cut Pro/Express: Some imported PSD files may only contain the background layer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2698&quot;&gt;Final Cut Pro: Speed interferes with Smooth Cam&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1846&quot;&gt;Final Cut Pro: Troubleshooting Basics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2682&quot;&gt;Final Cut Pro: Green frames or other anomalies on render with REDCODE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2681&quot;&gt;Final Cut Pro: Quality issue with movies you export from the Viewer with filters applied&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2680&quot;&gt;Final Cut Pro: Log and capture with DV50 sometimes does not work in French or Japanese&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Motion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2700&quot;&gt;Motion: Motion quits unexpectedly when exporting to REDCODE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Compressor&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1888&quot;&gt;Compressor: Troubleshooting basics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Logic&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3423&quot;&gt;Logic Express: Locating the Support ID and Serial Number&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Xsan&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3531&quot;&gt;Xsan 2: Compatibility of Xsan clients with Grass Valley SAN shared storage systems&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3461&quot;&gt;Xsan 2: Xsan Admin Setup Assistant appears when opening Xsan Admin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Misc&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1343&quot;&gt;Mac OS X keyboard shortcuts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2546&quot;&gt;Mac OS X: How to log a kernel panic &lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:31:33 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/recently_updated_applecare_docs__5109.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RED Rocket announced</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/red_rocket_announced.html</link>
      <description>Many within the RED community have been clamoring for an official conform tool to simplify online/offline RED workflows. Well, RED's gone one better with &lt;a href=&quot;http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=29331&quot;&gt;RED Rocket&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rocket is a hardware R3D decoder and debayer capable of realtime output of up to 30 fps @ 4K or 24 fps @ 5K. This completely removes the need for an offline (at least with the RED One - Epic will still need it at high resolutions), allowing you to work with 4K directly in FCP, Premiere, After Effects, RED Alert!, REDCINE, REDrushes or any application using the REDCODE SDK.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;It is PCI-Express (laptop users are out of luck here), is compatible with Windows, OS X and Linux, and features Quad-DVI and Quad-HD-SDI.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is bad news for DVS which just introduced &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dvs.de/news/press/press-single-news/2009/back_pid/9/article/dvs-unveils-hardware-accelerated-red-workflows-with-clipstersupRsup.html&quot;&gt;Clipster&lt;/a&gt; at NAB, however there could be a place in the market if they can undercut Rocket's $5k pricetag and beat it to market. There is currently no ETA on RED Rocket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Update:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reduser.net/forum/showpost.php?p=407749&amp;postcount=201&quot;&gt;Jim says two months&lt;/a&gt; but RED's release dates have been pushed back on many occasions.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:54:42 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/red_rocket_announced.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 for Mac Pro</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/nvidia_quadro_fx_4800_for_mac_pro.html</link>
      <description>The 2009 Mac Pros don't have a great range of graphics cards to choose from. You can go for the cut-down GeForce GT 120 or the more advanced Radeon 4870, and that's it unless you plump for an older card (not to mention of course the fact that you must buy one card for every Mini DisplayPort monitor you own, which screws up FCP).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's now another one to choose from - the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_quadro_fx_4800_for_mac_us.html&quot;&gt;NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800&lt;/a&gt;. It's incredibly powerful with 1.5 GB of memory, 192 CUDA parallel processing cores (!) and 76.8 GB/sec memory bandwidth. But its price tag matches its capabilities - $1799.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/nvidia_quadro.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would not actually recommend this for ProApp use, as the Quadros have not traditionally been optimized for Core Image operations (not to mention the small number of ProApps that utilize the GPU significantly) so a lot of that power goes to waste in Final Cut Studio. However, this card is often used for 3D modeling and visualization tasks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why was this not released with the 2009 Mac Pros? One explanation could be the fact it requires OS X 10.5.7 which has not been released yet. The card is scheduled to be released in May, which suggests 10.5.7 would also be released around that time too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is compatible with the 2008 and 2009 Mac Pros. Apple have not announced anything on their site so it remains to be seen if there will be a BTO option. Interestingly, NVIDIA's site only mentions Dual-Link DVI as a display option and does not mention Mini DisplayPort at all.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:31:57 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/nvidia_quadro_fx_4800_for_mac_pro.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3-31-09 New AppleCare articles</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/33109_new_applecare_articles.html</link>
      <description>Here is my roundup of recent useful AppleCare docs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Hardware&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2850&quot;&gt;Mac Pro: Noise, pops or clicks heard when monitoring a live recording&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2609&quot;&gt;Mac Pro (8-core): Memory and hard drive kit compatibility&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1200&quot;&gt;Promise VTrak: Configuring for optimal performance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2091&quot;&gt;Xserve (Early 2008) and Mac Pro (Early 2008): AXD, ASD and AHT may report the incorrect total VRAM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1752&quot;&gt;Vintage and obsolete products&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Final Cut Pro&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2677&quot;&gt;Changing system display settings causes Final Cut Pro/Express to quit unexpectedly&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2572&quot;&gt;Final Cut Pro/Express: Ingested AVCHD clips are sometimes distorted&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Motion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2670&quot;&gt;Motion 3.0.2: Masks on text layers can't be turned back on&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Soundtrack Pro&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2603&quot;&gt;Soundtrack Pro: May see &quot;Unexpected Problem&quot; alert when using some Audio Unit plug-ins&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Logic&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2648&quot;&gt;Logic Pro 8, Logic Express 8: Cannot select USB mic as an audio input&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3443&quot;&gt;Logic: Rebuilding the Loop Index&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2504&quot;&gt;GarageBand '09: Templates missing after Logic Studio or Logic Express 8 installation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Xsan&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3461&quot;&gt;Xsan 2: Xsan Admin Setup Assistant appears when opening Xsan Admin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2641&quot;&gt;Xsan 2.1.1: Xsan Admin cannot save SAN document&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Final Cut Server&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3282&quot;&gt;Final Cut Server: Connecting the database to the correct local user account&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:51:16 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/33109_new_applecare_articles.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Mac Pros, iMacs and Minis</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/new_mac_pros_imacs_and_minis.html</link>
      <description>Apple has hit us with three hardware refreshes in the same day. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Mac Mini&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/MacMini.jpg&quot; width=200 /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;1GB memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2GB memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;120GB hard drive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;320GB hard drive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;8x double-layer SuperDrive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;8x double-layer SuperDrive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;$599, shipping within 24 hours&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;$799, shipping within 24 hours&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm really glad this little guy is still going strong. There were fears it would be discontinued but thankfully this has not proven to be the case.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not the greatest specs in the world, but the GeForce 9400M is a welcome addition that should provide a decent performance boost to graphical apps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple is claiming that it now uses 45% less power, making it even more viable for server-related tasks (my personal favorite use for Minis). It's worth noting that the case has not been redesigned to match the iMac, as was rumored.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;iMac&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/imac.jpg&quot; width=250 /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;20&quot; display&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;24&quot; display&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;24&quot; display&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;24&quot; display&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2.93GHz Intel Core 2 Duo&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;2GB memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;4GB memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;4GB memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;4GB memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;320GB hard drive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;640GB hard drive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;640GB hard drive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1TB hard drive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;8x double-layer SuperDrive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;8x double-layer SuperDrive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;8x double-layer SuperDrive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;8x double-layer SuperDrive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 256MB memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 with 512MB memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;$1,199.00, shipping within 24 hours&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;$1,499.00, shipping within 24 hours&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;$1,799.00&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;$2,199.00&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not much to say here - just a speed bump and NVIDIA graphics across the whole line. The 24&quot; now starts at a lower pricepoint. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Mac Pro&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/mac_pro_side.jpg&quot; width=180 /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Quad-Core&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;8-Core&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;One 2.66GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon &quot;Nehalem&quot; processor&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Two 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon &quot;Nehalem&quot; processors&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;3GB (three 1GB) memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6GB (six 1GB) memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;640GB hard drive &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;640GB hard drive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;18x double-layer SuperDrive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;18x double-layer SuperDrive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 512MB&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 512MB&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;$2,499.00, ships within 4 days&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;$3,299.00, ships within 4 days&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And here's a custom configured Mac Pro with pretty much everything you'd ever need:&lt;br&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Two 2.93GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;32GB memory (8x4GB)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Mac Pro RAID Card&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;4 x 1TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB graphics&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Two 18x SuperDrives&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;2 x Apple Cinema HD Display (30&quot; flat panel)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;AirPort Extreme Wi-Fi Card with 802.11n&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Quad-channel 4Gb Fibre Channel PCI Express card&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Xsan 2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Mini DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI Adapter (needed for 2x 30&quot; displays&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;AppleCare protection plan for Mac Pro&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;$19,994.00, shipping in 6-8 weeks&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Processor - &lt;/b&gt; You might think it's just a speed bump but the Nehalem series of CPUs has a completely redesigned architecture that removes a lot of traditional bottlenecks. This will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macpro/performance.html&quot;&gt;significantly improve performance&lt;/a&gt; (particularly memory throughput) over previous Mac Pros.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The new architecture also allows two threads per core, meaning that 16 threads can be run simultaneously on the 8 core. I had wondered if Apple would market it as a 16 core machine but they chose not to, which is probably best as it could have been misleading.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Go for the 2.93 GHz processor if you can afford it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Memory - &lt;/b&gt; Apple has been generous with the memory in the 8-core model. My usual advice would be to custom configure the machine with the minimum amount of memory possible and then buy it separately from cheaper sources. Note however that the custom configurator offers a minimum of 6 GB of memory, which will be enough for the majority of people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hard Drives - &lt;/b&gt; There are four bays, each offering a 640 GB or 1 TB SATA drive at 7200 RPM. I'd advise against ordering additional drives from Apple. Instead, shop around and you will get a much better deal. They are dead simple to install.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple has chosen not to offer solid-state disks as an option.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Graphics - &lt;/b&gt; Apple is offering two cards - the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512MB and the ATI Radeon HD 4860 512MB. The GeForce card is available in multiples up to 4. I would not advise purchasing multiple graphics cards in anticipation of Snow Leopard, as you'd be forking out a lot of money for something that has an unknown performance benefit. You don't know that it would improve performance enough to warrant the extra cost, and you don't even know if Final Cut Studio 3 will be able to use the extra cards. You can always buy extra cards later.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Radeon is advised for Pro App use, however, as it has much better Core Image performance and a much greater range of working color depths. It is much faster than the GeForce and no comparable NVIDIA cards are yet offered as a BTO option for the Mac Pro. Both cards come with dual-link DVI and Mini DisplayPort connectors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note the absence of the NVIDIA Quadro FX. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Optical Drives - &lt;/b&gt; Not much to say really, except no Blu-ray.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Displays&lt;/b&gt; - The new graphics cards have support for the DisplayPort standard so the new 24&quot; LED Display can now be used by Mac Pros, in addition to the traditional 30&quot; Cinema Display. It looks like the 20&quot; will not be replaced.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note: you must have two GeForce cards in order to connect a second 24&quot; display, or a Mini DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI adapter if you are connecting two 30&quot; displays.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My advice would be to go for the 30&quot; because it is not glossy (there unfortunately isn't a matte option for the 24&quot;) and if you want to connect more than one, your choice of graphics card is not restricted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other minor aspects - &lt;/b&gt;There is no FireWire 400 - it's FW 800 only, like the MacBook Pro. You can use FW 400 devices with a converter cable. Bluetooth is now built-in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;It's a product refresh - you can't expect a whole host of new features. I think the Mac Pro refresh was a decent one (and long overdue) although I would prefer more display options from Apple. The 24&quot; should have a matte option for those that prefer it, but what I dislike the most is that you are tied to the much slower GeForce if you want to add two of these.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Additionally, no-one really knows the future of the 30&quot;. Is it wise to buy one now when there could be a possible refresh in the near future? Or is it actually &lt;b&gt;better&lt;/b&gt; to buy one now in case Apple gives us an inferior refreshed product in the future (it has happened before)? Or should we just buy from an alternative manufacturer? That is the question.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm really glad they chose to release these machines while Leopard was still around. It means that when I come to buy one in the near future, I can downgrade to Leopard if problems occur with Snow Leopard. It's not best to be an early adopter of an OS if you use it for professional work, nor is it best to downgrade to an earlier OS that does not support your computer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The price hike for the Mac Pros was less welcome but this is mainly due to the increased cost of the CPUs from Intel, so it was not unexpected. Whenever Apple gives us something, they take away something else - but I do think in this instance Apple has given more than they have taken.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Update:&lt;/b&gt; Apple also gave the 15&quot; MacBook Pro a speed bump.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:25:17 MST</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/new_mac_pros_imacs_and_minis.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blu-ray license simplification coming mid-2009</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/bluray_license_simplification_coming_mid2009.html</link>
      <description>ZDnet is &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.zdnet.co.uk/itmanagement/0,1000000308,39619195,00.htm&quot;&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; that many of the problems preventing Blu-ray from coming to the Mac should ease in mid-2009 when new licensing comes into place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;A new licence will be established by mid-2009 as a &quot;one-stop shop&quot; for device makers. The licence will include all necessary Blu-ray, DVD and CD patents for selling Blu-ray players. The licensing programme will be handled by a new licensing company to be led by Gerald Rosenthal, former head of intellectual property at IBM. It will be based in the US, but will have local branches in Asia, Europe and Latin America.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead of having to approach Blu-ray, DVD and CD holders individually and paying them separate royalties, the single licence should cut down the total cost of royalty payments by 40 percent, according to Sony.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fees for the new licences will be $9.50 for a Blu-ray player and $14 for a Blu-ray recorder. Making Blu-ray Disc will cost 11 cents for read-only, 12 cents for recordable discs and 15 cents for rewritable discs.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully this new license coupled with new DisplayPort Mac Pros will encourage Apple to consider Blu-ray drives as an option for its high-end systems.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:49:29 MST</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/bluray_license_simplification_coming_mid2009.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>20&quot; Cinema Display discontinued</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/20_cinema_display_discontinued.html</link>
      <description>MacRumors is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macrumors.com/2009/02/19/apple-discontinues-20-cinema-display-product-refreshes-coming/&quot;&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; that Apple has now officially discontinued the 20&quot; Cinema Display, not long after the 23&quot; display was also discontinued. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although Apple offers a newer &lt;a href=&quot;http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB382LL/A?mco=MzE2OTkyNw&quot;&gt;24&quot; LED display&lt;/a&gt;, this is currently only compatible with Apple's laptop range using the new Mini-DisplayPort connectors. There is no adapter available to connect these up to a DVI-enabled machine. This means that the only current choice for Mac Pro buyers is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://store.apple.com/us/product/M9179LL/A?mco=MzE2OTkyOA&quot;&gt;30&quot; display&lt;/a&gt;, which may not meet their budget or space requirements.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Never fear, the most probable reason for EOL-ing the display is to make way for new stock that will most likely ship when new Mac Pros with (Mini) DisplayPort connectors are released. That is the core market for these displays - I doubt many laptop owners have purchased one. Here's hoping they'll take a leaf out of the new 17&quot; MBP's book and offer a matte option.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Note:&lt;/b&gt; Apple is no longer shipping these to resellers, but that's not to say these resellers haven't got a few 20&quot; displays still in stock. If you call around, you might be lucky.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:55:07 MST</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/20_cinema_display_discontinued.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Backup Options for Filmmakers</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/backup_options_for_filmmakers.html</link>
      <description>As filmmakers, we put a tremendous amount of trust in our equipment. With the rise in popularity of solid-state media, many of us are no longer shooting on tape or film.  This offers many advantages but also several disadvantages. Unlike a film workflow in which many prints are made, or a tape workflow where the tapes are digitized to a hard drive and then stored safely away, filmmakers are often erasing their solid-state media and relying on a single hard drive copy to last them throughout the post production process and onto distribution/release. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Three things are guaranteed in life - death, taxes and hard drive failure. It is a fact that every hard drive will eventually fail. No-one can predict when it will happen and you may not have an opportunity to salvage the data before it does.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So it is wise to assume it will happen and have a good backup policy in case it does. Here are some of the options available for data backup.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Data Tape&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/lto_tape.jpg&quot; width=200 style=&quot;float:right; margin-left:10px&quot; /&gt;While there used to be many consumer options available such as the Iomega Ditto, tape backup is now almost exclusively geared towards enterprise users. Higher-priced options have high capacities and autoload capabilities - i.e. where you insert multiple tapes at once and the system switches them automatically so you don't have to. Lower-priced options will generally require you to change the tape far more often - if you're fine with that, you can save a lot of money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most backup drive manufacturers are moving towards the LTO format. This is an open standard so you know that the data you backup now will work on a competitor's drive for the next 1-2 LTO generations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/vxa2_drive.jpg&quot; width=200 style=&quot;float:left; margin-right:10px&quot; /&gt;One way to save money is to use an older, less advanced format. A lot of manufacturers still offer older proprietary systems for sale. These are not as advanced as the LTO options (nor as compatible with competing products) but they are much cheaper. As stated earlier, cheaper drives have lower storage capacities and are less likely to have autoloading functionality. They are also likely to have much lower data transfer rates, unlike LTO -3 and LTO-4 which can transfer data at higher speeds than a conventional hard drive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When purchasing a drive, consider also the connector and the supplied software. Some drives use SCSI and will need a SCSI card installed inside your machine, but setup will be much easier if you opt for a Firewire version instead (not to mention allowing greater drive portability). Check if the supplied software is compatible with your operating system and if not, check if there is a compatibility update available.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because these tapes are designed for enterprise use, they are very sturdy and have extremely low failure rates. They have normally been stress-tested by the manufacturer, and most manufacturers will offer you failure statistics on their site. You are, of course, paying for this privilege though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Format types:&lt;/b&gt; LTO, VXA, SLR, DLT, DDS, AIT/SAIT, Travan, T10000&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Drive manufacturers:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tandbergdata.com/us/&quot;&gt;Tandberg (formerly Exabyte)&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://h18006.www1.hp.com/storage/tapestorage/&quot;&gt;HP&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quantum.com/&quot;&gt;Quantum&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/tape/&quot;&gt;IBM&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sun.com/storagetek/tape.jsp&quot;&gt;Sun StorageTek&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Software:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.retrospect.com/&quot;&gt;Retrospect&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bakbone.com/&quot;&gt;NetVault&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commvault.com/&quot;&gt;CommVault&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ultrabac.com/&quot;&gt;UltraBac&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://archiware.com/index.php?hp=126&quot;&gt;PresSTORE&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atempo.com/&quot;&gt;ATempo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Low failure rate&lt;br&gt;* Tried and tested&lt;br&gt;* LTO-4 tapes can store terrabytes of data and access it faster than a regular hard disk&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Expensive&lt;br&gt;* Can be complex to set up&lt;br&gt;* If you opt for a cheaper, small capacity, non-autoloading version, you will spend a lot of time changing tapes&lt;br&gt;* Overkill if you don't have much data to backup&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Verdict:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great if you're backing up a large amount of data and only plan to keep one copy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Hard disk&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/hard_disk.jpg&quot; width=140 style=&quot;float:right; margin-left:10px&quot; /&gt;The main advantage of hard disks is market penetration. You can go into almost any store and buy a disk at short notice. They are priced very low per GB, there are lots to choose from and (unless you have an old machine) you shouldn't need any new hardware or software in order to use it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As this is primarily intended as a backup, go for an external drive. Speed is not an issue here so mounting the drive internally will offer no worthwhile performance benefit. Additionally, an external disk safely stored away will not be damaged if something happens to your machine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/lacie_external_hdd.jpg&quot; width=140 style=&quot;float:left; margin-right:10px&quot; /&gt;It's worth mentioning that some manufacturers offer separate Mac and PC editions of their external disk drives. This is not a marketing gimmick - there is a difference! Some of the I/O controllers in certain drives (often cheaper ones) are not Mac-compatible and you will experience issues if you use one of these drives. Choose a drive enclosure with an Oxford controller where possible. Check online  reviews if in doubt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, one aspect people often don't realize is that hard disks store data magnetically and must be &quot;refreshed&quot; every six months or so to prevent data loss, as Larry Jordan explains in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.larryjordan.biz/articles/lj_hard_disk_warning.html&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt;. This must not be overlooked when considering hard disks as a backup medium.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Manufacturers:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lacie.com/&quot;&gt;Lacie&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.g-technology.com/&quot;&gt;G-Tech&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.samsung.com/global/business/hdd/&quot;&gt;Samsung&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wdc.com/en/&quot;&gt;Western Digital&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/&quot;&gt;Seagate&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.maxtor.com/en/index.html&quot;&gt;Maxtor&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hitachigst.com/&quot;&gt;Hitachi&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.toshibastorage.com/&quot;&gt;Toshiba&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Cheap&lt;br&gt;* Ubiquitous&lt;br&gt;* High capacity&lt;br&gt;* Fast transfer rate&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Relatively high and unpredictable failure rate&lt;br&gt;* Physical bumps and bashes increase the chance of failure&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Verdict:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good for cost-effective backups but multiple backups are advised.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Solid-state flash drives&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/sandisk_ssd.jpg&quot; width=140 style=&quot;float:right; margin-left:10px&quot; /&gt;The main advantages of these drives are their small size, high potential read speed and high damage tolerance. It is likely that these will eventually replace conventional hard disks in the future and this will be a good thing, however current models have certain caveats.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The biggest of these is price. The cost per GB is considerably higher than any of the other formats on this page, and available capacities are much lower than those offered by conventional hard disks. In addition, although read speeds are fast, write speeds are considerably slower than those of conventional hard drives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/toshiba_ssd.jpg&quot; width=180 style=&quot;float:left; margin-right:10px&quot; /&gt;One of the most interesting aspects of flash SSDs is the way that they fail. Unlike rotating disk hard drives, SSDs do not suffer from mechanical failure but gradually wear out as you write to them. Although they have quite a high failure rate (each memory cell is limited to 100,000 writes), failure doesn't actually result in data loss. When a memory cell fails, you will be unable to write data to that cell - but you will have no problems at all reading data from it. This would be awful for a scratch disk that is written to many times but perfect for a backup in which reading is more important than writing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, controller chips inside the drives have been known to fail, meaning you will need to call a data recovery expert to recover the data from the disk. And there lies another problem - a lot of manufacturers uses proprietary chips that are constantly changing, making it difficult for a data recovery expert to keep up with developments. And in many drives data is difficult to recover by design, as these systems were originally developed for the military to carry sensitive information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Efforts are being made to resolve some of these issues - such as putting two drives in a RAID 0 to improve write speeds, and balancing write operations across the entire drive to reduce the load on a single cell. Prices are going down and capacities are going up, but they will only become viable when the cost hits $1.50 per GB or less.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Manufacturers:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/products/flash/ssd/2008/home/home.html&quot;&gt;Samsung&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/ssd/index.html&quot;&gt;IBM&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intel.com/design/flash/NAND/mainstream/&quot;&gt;Intel&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.corsair.com/products/ssd/default.aspx&quot;&gt;Corsair&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.sandisk.com/OEM/ProductCatalog(1321)-SanDisk_SSD_SATA_5000_25.aspx&quot;&gt;SanDisk&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.toshiba.com/taec/Catalog/Family.do?familyid=7&amp;subfamilyid=900314&quot;&gt;Toshiba&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Very fast read speeds&lt;br&gt;* Tolerant of physical abuse / damage&lt;br&gt;* More predictable failure rate than regular HDDs&lt;br&gt;* Data can still be read when drive fails&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Very expensive per GB&lt;br&gt;* Slow write speeds&lt;br&gt;* Current drives have relatively low capacities&lt;br&gt;* Limited number of times the drive can be written to&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Verdict:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;One to look out for the future but limited to small backups right now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Online Backup / Storage&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/mozy_logo.gif&quot; width=122 style=&quot;float:right; margin-left:10px&quot; /&gt;There are several online backup services available. Some will give you a certain amount of space for free, requiring you to upgrade if you need more, while others offer a trial service. The advantage of one of these services is that the data is stored elsewhere and so will not  be affected by theft, fire, water damage etc affecting your facility. Many of them offer software that runs on your machine and backs up your specified backup folders automatically, ensuring an up-to-date backup even if you forget. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When considering this option, you should consider security as a priority. You are handing over your files to someone else so you need an assurance that they will not end up in the wrong hands. I use Mozy to backup my laptop and all files are encrypted by default. The simplest option is to let Mozy create an encryption key for you but this is not as secure as specifying one yourself. If you do specify a custom one, beware that your data will be permanently inaccessible if you forget it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/idrive_logo.jpg&quot; style=&quot;float:left; margin-right:10px&quot; /&gt;The two biggest problems are storage space and transfer speeds. It is impractical to upload files greater than a few hundred megabytes, especially as the service takes quite a while to encrypt them before uploading. So backing up terrabytes of footage is not possible, but these services are very useful for backing up important project files. Many of them will store multiple versions of a file so you can restore to a version several days or weeks in the past. I wouldn't recommend this as your sole backup, but it would be useful as an extra cushion, especially as some companies give a small amount of space for free.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Services:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozy.com&quot;&gt;Mozy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carbonite.com/&quot;&gt;Carbonite&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drbackup.net/&quot;&gt;Dr. Backup&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getdropbox.com/&quot;&gt;DropBox&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.idrive.com/&quot;&gt;iDrive&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Simple and automatic&lt;br&gt;* Great for backing up small files&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Not suitable for large files&lt;br&gt;* Subscription fees&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Verdict:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great as an additional backup but don't rely on this as your only option. Only suitable for small files.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Videotape&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/hdcam_tapes.gif&quot; width=220 style=&quot;float:right; margin-left:10px&quot; /&gt;Videotape backups offer some distinct advantages over data tape backups. Firstly, unlike the LTO specification that has various revisions, video formats adhere to strict standards that rarely change.  These standards tend to stick around for a long time. A brand-new DVCAM deck will play a DVCAM tape made a decade ago with no problems. LTO drives are only backwards-compatible with the last 1-2 generations which could cause problems with long-term backup.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, there is greater predictability. Tapes are rated at the hour or half-hour, making it much easier to calculate how many would be needed and how long it would take to record/play the footage, which is invaluable if you are planning to rent a deck. The downside of this, of course, is that transfer speeds are much lower than modern LTO drives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/digibeta_deck.jpg&quot; width=220 style=&quot;float:left; margin-right:10px&quot; /&gt;However, when creating a videotape backup of your footage, it is important to choose the format carefully to avoid quality loss. If you shot on the Panasonic HVX-200, which shoots DVCPRO HD, it is recommended to output to DVCPRO HD tapes. If the codec you are using does not have a tape equivalent, output to a tape format that closely matches the frame size, frame rate, color sampling and approximate data rate of the original footage. Some formats like Redcode RAW 4K do not have tape equivalents and so a different backup method must be used unless you are willing to lose information. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also make sure your tape timecode matches the timecode of the original footage, otherwise your NLE will not be able to accurately reconnect the footage to the clips on the timeline. You will spend a lot of time manually rearranging and synchronizing footage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Formats include:&lt;/b&gt; MiniDV, HDV (varies per manufacturer), DVCAM, DVCPRO, DVCPRO HD, HDCAM, HDCAM SR, D1, D2, D3, D5, BetaCam, DigiBeta.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Manufacturers:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.panasonic.com/business/provideo/home.asp&quot;&gt;Panasonic&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/cat-videorecorders/&quot;&gt;Sony&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/category.jsp?productId=DISC1.1.2&quot;&gt;JVC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Durable&lt;br&gt;* Established standards&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Limited to real-time capture and playback&lt;br&gt;* No tape equivalent of certain formats&lt;br&gt;* Information must be captured rather than simply copied to a hard disk&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Verdict:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great for backing up established formats. Excellent for long-term backup / archival.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Blu-ray&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/bluray_logo.png&quot; width=150 style=&quot;float:right; margin-left:10px&quot; /&gt;Blu-ray discs can store around 50 GB and have a relatively low price per GB. They are compact and, if stored in a solid case, are relatively durable compared to regular hard disks. They are not as durable as tape-based alternatives, however.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Blu-ray hasn't caught on as well as everyone had hoped after the format war ended, and Apple has not yet implemented hardware or OS support for it yet. This has severely limited the availability of Blu-ray burners and software for the Mac, with the only option for data discs being Roxio Toast 10 plus the Blu-ray plugin. PC users have a lot more choice but even despite this, it has still not fully caught on in the PC market either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Transfer rates are quite low and the format doesn't offer as much disc space as other formats. However, BD-R does have an advantage as a backup medium because it can only be written to once. Every other format can be written to or erased (some more easily than others) after a backup has occurred.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Drive Manufacturers:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;categoryId=16192&amp;SR=nav:electronics:computers:our_technologies:blu-ray_disc:ss&amp;ref=http%3A//www.sony.com/index.php&quot;&gt;Sony&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lacie.com/products/range.htm?id=10058&quot;&gt;LaCie&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.lge.com/products/category/list/computer%20products_optical%20drives_optical%20drives.jhtml&quot;&gt;LG&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/Products/HomeEntertainment/Blu-rayDisc+DVD/Enhanced+Content/Blu-ray&quot;&gt;Pioneer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Software Manufacturers:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roxio.com/&quot;&gt;Roxio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sonic.com/&quot;&gt;Sonic Solutions&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nero.com&quot;&gt;Nero&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/encore/&quot;&gt;Adobe Encore&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Discs relatively cheap per GB&lt;br&gt;* Data cannot be overwritten&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Not much support on the Mac&lt;br&gt;* Slow read/write speeds&lt;br&gt;* Low disc space compared to other offerings&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Verdict:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't rely on it as a sole backup. Not suitable for large amounts of data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;A Game of Chance&lt;/h3&gt;None of the options listed above are infallible, however the point is to lower the &lt;i&gt;chance&lt;/i&gt; of losing your data. If you have one backup, that lowers the chance of critical data loss to 0.5. Make another one and it goes down to 0.25. Backups are especially crucial if you're running a RAID because the chance of data loss increases with every drive you add (unless it is a RAID 1 of course).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So it doesn't really matter which option you choose, as any one of them will reduce that chance - some more than others of course. A mix of multiple types is the safest way to go. And when thousands or millions of dollars, plus the culmination of months or perhaps years of hard work are at stake, it helps to have a pro-active backup policy planned from the start. The fate of your movie might well depend on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=1&gt;The links to companies and products in this article are intended for guidance and not as an endorsement.&lt;/font&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:56:51 MST</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/backup_options_for_filmmakers.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PowerBooks to become obsolete in March</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/powerbooks_to_become_obsolete_in_march.html</link>
      <description>Just a heads-up: the following product lines will be obsolete on March 17th:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    * PowerBook G4&lt;br&gt;    * Power Mac G4 (Digital Audio)&lt;br&gt;    * Power Mac G4 (Quicksilver)&lt;br&gt;    * Macintosh Server G4 (Digital Audio)&lt;br&gt;    * Macintosh Server G4 (Quicksilver)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The following lines will become &quot;vintage&quot; on March 17th (this means that replacement parts will only be available in California for a limited time):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    * Xserve RAID&lt;br&gt;    * Xserve (Slot Load)&lt;br&gt;    * Xserve (Cluster Node)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you own any of these items, it is worth stocking up on spares and getting any issues fixed before the March 17th deadline.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tuaw.com/2009/02/04/apple-welcome-to-the-obsolete-list-powerbook-g4/&quot;&gt;TUAW&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:58:34 MST</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/powerbooks_to_become_obsolete_in_march.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Speculation on Mac Pro refresh</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/speculation_on_mac_pro_refresh.html</link>
      <description>It's been more than a year since the current Mac Pros came out. Although the software to fully take advantage of them is still not here, a year is a long time and technology has moved on. As a 2009 refresh is very likely, here's some speculation on what the new machines are likely to be like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First of all, a release to coincide with Snow Leopard is very likely, as the Mac Pros are the best-equipped machines in Apple's lineup to show off the new OS. Snow Leopard will be released (assuming no iPhone-related delays this time) in either Q1 or Q2 2009, discounting any hardware that is due to be released after this date.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;CPU&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/intelcpu.jpg&quot; height=100/&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm almost certain this will be a Xeon 5500 series &quot;Gainestown&quot;. That will be Intel's most powerful CPU line until Beckton towards the end of the year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although the clock speeds are identical to the Harpertown range inside current machines, they offer significant performance boosts elsewhere. The biggest of these is an on-die memory controller (i.e. built into the CPU instead of on the motherboard). This reduces bottlenecking significantly and is something AMD's chips have had for several years. It will provide a major performance boost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another new technology is QuickPath Interconnect, which replaces the legacy Front-Side Bus (FSB). The FSB connects all system devices and memory to the CPU through a single interface. This is now split up, with the new memory controller handling memory and QuickPath Interconnect dealing with the other system components. You may have noticed that the caches on these CPUs are smaller than their predecessors - this is because the greater efficiency in the new architecture means data spends less time in cache memory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There have been several optimizations to multithreading, including hyperthreading which allows two threads per core (great for Snow Leopard). Although Gainestown is limited to four cores per CPU (8 in total in a Mac Pro), Apple may market it as a 16-core machine because of the 8 extra logical cores. True 16-core machines will not be available until the end of the year when the Beckton series is released.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Memory&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/ram.jpg&quot; height=100 /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're probably familiar with dual channel memory which doubles memory bandwidth. That's why you have to install Mac Pro memory modules in pairs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The new architecture has triple channel memory! Mac Pro motherboards are expected to have three rows of four memory sockets, totaling a maximum of 96 GB (12 x 8 GB). You would be required to install chips in groups of three.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Hard Disk Options&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/harddisk.jpg&quot; height=100 /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2 TB internal hard disks are now available so it seems likely that Apple will offer these in their machines. This will allow up to 8 TB in total.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What about solid-state disks? I doubt they will be offered for the Mac Pro just yet. They're too small for media storage (unless you can afford to RAID them) and although they are a decent size for boot disks I don't think they are suitable for that purpose just yet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I always put Western Digital Raptors (10,000 RPM) as boot disks inside my machines because they reduce boot times, load applications faster, and everything is generally more responsive as memory can be paged to and from disk a lot faster. So the fast read speeds of SSDs are welcome from me, but there are two problems. Writing is slow. The OS writes a lot of data to disk and you will notice a slowdown when multitasking or using a lot of memory at once. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The second problem is that each memory cell inside the drive has a lifetime of around 100,000 writes. You can easily exceed that in the lifetime of your computer, particularly if it is switched on constantly. Modern chips try to get around this by writing evenly to all areas of the disk in order to balance it out, but the usefulness of this will depend on the total size of the disk.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SSD technology looks very promising and these are problems that will be overcome as time goes on, but they are not ready for this kind of usage just yet in my opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Graphics cards&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/graphicscard.jpg&quot; height=100 /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know what the stock graphics card will be but the following cards may be offered as options:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Radeon 4870&lt;/b&gt; - This is a high-end card capable of accelerating H.264 and MPEG-2 encoding and decoding. ATI's drivers are traditionally much better optimized for Core Image than NVIDIA's so Final Cut Studio performance is likely to be good. Crossfire technology is available on the PC version of the card - it remains to be seen if this is something Apple will embrace. Another version, the 4870 X2 with dual GPUs, will not be available for the Mac.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It comes with DisplayPort and HDMI connectors. Apple may request a Mini DisplayPort connector instead (or in addition).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;GeForce GTX 285&lt;/b&gt; - This is a single-GPU card that is SLI-capable (NVIDIA's equivalent to Crossfire), should Apple choose to utilize that technology. This card does not offer DisplayPort by default so this is something likely to be requested by Apple for the Mac version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's hope NVIDIA improve their Mac drivers to offer better Core Image performance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Quadro FX 5800&lt;/b&gt; - This card supports DisplayPort technologies as well as the brand-new OpenGL 3.0 specification (which the other cards do not). It's very fast but also very expensive. It is not necessarily guaranteed to make a significant difference to Pro App usage because, while it has a lot of raw power, it does not have some of the optimizations that the other cards have (e.g. H.264 hardware acceleration), and I don't know how well-optimized for Core Image they are. In addition, raw power is worthless if it is bottlenecked by other components in your system.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With the launch of Snow Leopard, Apple will be trying to sell us multiple graphics cards in our machines. I would personally wait until I have read reviews before deciding on purchasing multiple cards for Pro App usage. Also, I would have to wait until Final Cut Studio 3 came out anyway because multiple cards with FCS 2 cause problems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Things you shouldn't hold your breath for&lt;/h3&gt;* eSATA - Apple has completely ignored this particular technology in the past - this time around will most likely be no different.&lt;br&gt;* FireWire S3200 / USB 3.0 - It's early days and I'm not aware of any devices currently supporting the new standards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;It's pure speculation but if my predictions come true, there will be a hell of a lot of new tech in the Mac Pros. Which is great because they'll be leaving a lot of legacy technologies behind - but on the other hand, new things carry a certain degree of risk. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first-gen Mac Pros needed a couple of firmware updates to fix minor issues, and I have my own rule that says I refuse to use an operating system for professional work until at least 10.x.4. This rule will be particularly crucial for Snow Leopard which now has a 64-bit kernel, meaning every system component will need new drivers. This is fine for the hardware that ships with your machine but what about third-party capture cards, graphics tablets etc? I don't think it's going to be a huge problem but it's worth thinking about in advance. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either way, 2009 looks pretty good for video professionals.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:21:39 MST</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/speculation_on_mac_pro_refresh.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Detailed review of new LED Cinema Display</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/detailed_review_of_new_led_cinema_display.html</link>
      <description>AppleInsider has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/12/07/apples_led_cinema_display_the_review.html&quot;&gt;5-page review&lt;/a&gt; of Apple's new 24-inch Cinema Display. What I particularly like about this review is that it shows the professional viewpoint as well as the consumer one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No review of this monitor is complete without a discussion of glossy screens (and I know that's the bit everyone wants to hear), so here it is:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;With the use of a glass cover, though, Apple may have taken one of its biggest risks yet. The glass introduces a significant amount of gloss and, with it, reflections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The impact of reflections is somewhat overstated by those most determined to avoid it; while you might notice at first, in everyday use with typical lighting conditions they're not often noticeable. Even at the bezel, where the always-black surface can act as a dull mirror, reflections are seldom distracting. We've even heard of artists or video editors consciously opting for the glossy displays, as the switch away from matte can actually produce a truer representation of the final color output and prevent someone using Adobe Photoshop, Aperture, or a similar suite from instinctively oversaturating the image before it's sent to the web or the printer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Assuming conditions are ideal, that is. While in our testing the background was never really an issue, there are certain circumstances in which the gloss is unavoidable. Viewing a predominantly black website or other document in daylight will also let you view yourself, for example. And if you're unfortunate enough to sit in front of bright spot lighting (chandeliers, fluorescent ceiling lights, and certain floor-standing lamps come to mind), it may be hard to escape the reflection short of moving the display itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These conditions are usually only minor inconveniences to everyday users, but they're potential deal breakers for certain creative professionals. For those who aren't clinging to limited palette throughout the entire workflow, visible reflections make it harder to gauge the exact color value a subject should use or whether a portion of the image too bright or too dark. It can also be a nuisance when trying to look for fine detail that might be obscured by the image of a window background.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As such, these experts have to either carefully manage their lighting conditions or else consider another display. It's not a disaster, but it's a hindrance that was never an issue with the previous generation. Most entertainment-minded users don't object to matte screens, but many artists do object to gloss. The environmental tradeoff of glass just wasn't entirely worthwhile here no matter how many in the broader public might like it.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm posting this review because, if the MacBook Pro is anything to go by, Apple will probably not offer matte alternatives when it upgrades the 20&quot; and 30&quot; displays. It's good to hear that the new displays are at least as color-accurate as the previous generation but the glossy screen will be a deal-breaker for many people. It all depends on the environment though. The best thing to do is buy one (when a compatible Mac Pro comes out of course), try it and return it within 14 days for a refund if you cannot stand it. Because, to my mind, this sounds like a great monitor for a well-lit environment - and if you are doing color-critical work, you should be in a well-lit environment, glossy screen or otherwise.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:54:00 MST</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/detailed_review_of_new_led_cinema_display.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Replacing the CRT</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/replacing_the_crt.html</link>
      <description>Broadcast Engineering has a great &lt;a href=&quot;http://broadcastengineering.com/news/replacing-crt-iii-1102/&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; called Replacing the CRT. This details some of the existing and upcoming technologies looking to resign CRT broadcast monitors to the grave. They are:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Plasma&lt;br&gt;* DLP&lt;br&gt;* SED (which looks very promising - not out yet though)&lt;br&gt;* OLED&lt;br&gt;* FED&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This article is well worth checking out.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:46:05 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/replacing_the_crt.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is this the death of FireWire?</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/is_this_the_death_of_firewire.html</link>
      <description>One of the biggest things making the rounds this week is the fact that Apple's new MacBooks have had their FireWire 400 port removed. Now why would Apple do this when they were the company that popularized it in the first place?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Someone posted an email purportedly from Steve Jobs onto Flickr in which Steve states that most modern consumer camcorders nowadays operate over USB 2. That may well be the case but as we all know, FireWire is the superior standard and it seems silly in my eyes to phase it out in favor of an inferior format. It seems like a case of Betamax vs VHS in which the most convenient format and not the best format actually won, with the best format relegated solely to the professional market. It's a great shame in my eyes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Advertising may also play a part too - USB 2 is advertised as operating at 480 Mbps vs FireWire's 400 Mbps which looks good on paper but as we all know, FireWire is capable of &lt;i&gt;sustaining&lt;/i&gt; 400 Mbps whereas 480 Mbps is just a theoretical limit for USB 2. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FireWire still hasn't achieved mass adoption among PC users. Apple is its primary proponent so if Apple lets it go, it will most likely die (as a consumer format at least). It's good to see it remain on the professional side - where I think it will stay for some time - but it's a little more inconvenient to now need an adapter to use FireWire 400 equipment. This is inconvenient because there seems to be considerably more 400 equipment out there than 800.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The most troubling thing for me isn't the demise of FireWire, it's the lack of a suitable replacement from Apple. eSATA would be great for hard drives but Apple seems to be shunning it for reasons unknown. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:03:49 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/is_this_the_death_of_firewire.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blu-ray is a &quot;bag of hurt&quot; says Steve Jobs</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/bluray_is_a_bag_of_hurt_says_steve_jobs.html</link>
      <description>This was something I missed on Tuesday as I didn't see the actual keynote address, only what Apple posted on their web site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/14/steve-jobs-calls-blu-ray-a-bag-of-hurt/&quot;&gt;Engadget&lt;/a&gt;, Steve Jobs is blaming licensing issues for the current lack of Blu-ray on the Mac. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt. It's great to watch the movies, but the licensing of the tech is so complex, we're waiting till things settle down and Blu-ray takes off in the marketplace.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's good to finally hear something from Apple on this subject. I guess, much like when Apple introduced DVD burners, they are waiting for larger consumer adoption and significant falls in the price of media before committing. Unfortunately that's not so helpful for Pro App users.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:51:15 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/bluray_is_a_bag_of_hurt_says_steve_jobs.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New laptops and Cinema Displays</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/new_laptops_and_cinema_displays.html</link>
      <description>Apple today released complete redesigns of their laptop line and, unexpectedly, they are offering a new Cinema Display. The new designs are in the black and aluminum style of the new iMac.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Cinema Displays&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;* 24&quot; screen&lt;br&gt;* Price: $899&lt;br&gt;* ONLY the new design is available in black and silver. The old designs (20&quot;, 23&quot; and 30&quot;) are still available on the store but we don't know for how long.&lt;br&gt;* LED backlight (easier on both the eye and the environment at the same time)&lt;br&gt;* Built-in iSight camera, mic and speakers&lt;br&gt;* Internal MagSafe power adapter that allows you to charge a MacBook&lt;br&gt;* Built-in USB ports, NO Firewire&lt;br&gt;* Connects via MiniDVI&lt;br&gt;* Max resolution 1920x1080&lt;br&gt;* Glossy glass screen&lt;br&gt;* Contrast ratio 1000:1 (massive increase from 400:1)&lt;br&gt;* 14 ms response time (same as previous gen)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;My thoughts -&lt;/b&gt; Seems to be aimed at consumers due to the lack of FireWire, relatively low resolution (the old 23&quot; offered 1920x1200), glossy screen, Mini DVI connector and the fact that every single photograph shows a MacBook tethered to it. Looks nice for watching HD iTunes movies on though. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And it gets bonus points for a huge increase in contrast ratio. I wouldn't advise it for color-critical work though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/displays/&quot;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;MacBook&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* One-piece aluminum cases (this is the &quot;brick&quot; everyone was referring to)&lt;br&gt;* The original white plastic MacBook remains but lowered to $999&lt;br&gt;* GeForce 9400M graphics chipset (256 MB shared memory) delivers a significant boost in graphics performance over the previous Intel on-board graphics&lt;br&gt;* Ultra-thin LED display&lt;br&gt;* All-glass multi-touch trackpad&lt;br&gt;* 5 hours of &quot;wireless productivity&quot;&lt;br&gt;* USB-only, NO Firewire&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Low-end model ($1299):&lt;br&gt;* 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo&lt;br&gt;* 3MB L2 cache&lt;br&gt;* 2GB of RAM (expandable to 4 GB)&lt;br&gt;* 160GB HD (or upgrade to 320 GB HD or 128 GB SSD)&lt;br&gt;* 8x Superdrive&lt;br&gt;* 2x USB&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;High-end model ($1599):&lt;br&gt;* 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo&lt;br&gt;* 3MB L2 cache, 2GB of RAM (expandable to 4 GB)&lt;br&gt;* 250GB HD (or 320 GB HD or 128 GB SSD)&lt;br&gt;* 8x Superdrive&lt;br&gt;* 2x USB&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;My thoughts - &lt;/b&gt; The graphical upgrades are much-appreciated but there is no FireWire which makes it of limited professional use. Also, there is no indication as to whether or not these machines can boot into Target Disk Mode (which makes the machine behave like an external hard disk which is great for backing up data if the machine fails).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macbook/design.html&quot;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;MacBook Air&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Nvidia GeForce 9400M graphics chipset&lt;br&gt;* Identical form factor to previous model&lt;br&gt;* SSD doubled in size from 64 to 128 GB&lt;br&gt;* Faster CPU&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Low-end model ($1799):&lt;br&gt;* 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo&lt;br&gt;* 6 MB L2 Cache&lt;br&gt;* 2 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 Memory&lt;br&gt;* 120 GB SATA hard drive&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;High-end model ($2499):&lt;br&gt;* 1.86 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo&lt;br&gt;* 6 MB L2 Cache&lt;br&gt;* 2 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 Memory&lt;br&gt;* 128 GB solid state drive&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;My thoughts - &lt;/b&gt; Could be good if a lightweight machine is important. Speed is now less of an issue than with the previous model but still a significant factor. No FireWire so storage options are limited.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macbookair/&quot;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;MacBook Pro&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the features of the MacBook above, as well as:&lt;br&gt;* 256 MB GeForce 9600M GT graphics in addition to the GeForce 9400&lt;br&gt;* Only 15&quot; models available&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Low-end model ($1999):&lt;br&gt;* 15.4&quot; LED-backlit display&lt;br&gt;* 2.4 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo (3MB L2 cache)&lt;br&gt;* 2GB DDR3 RAM&lt;br&gt;* 250 GB 5400 RPM hard drive (or 250 GB 7200 RPM or 320GB 7200 RPM or 128GB solid-state drive)&lt;br&gt;* Slot-loading Super Drive&lt;br&gt;* FireWire 800 replaces FireWire 400&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;High-end model ($2400):&lt;br&gt;* 15.4&quot; LED-backlit display&lt;br&gt;* 2.53 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo (6MB of L2 cache) (with 2.8 GHz upgrade option)&lt;br&gt;* 4GB DDR3 RAM&lt;br&gt;* 320 GB 5400 RPM hard drive (or 250 GB 7200 RPM or 320GB 7200 RPM or 128GB solid-state drive)&lt;br&gt;* Slot-loading Super Drive&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;My thoughts - &lt;/b&gt; Out of all of the new products unveiled today, this is the only one geared at professional users. It's faster (2.8 up from 2.6) and has faster memory and front side bus. It also has a 128 GB solid-state disk as an option, which will give a further speed boost. It's not a must-buy for previous MacBook Pro owners as the main selling point is the visual redesign, but it's good if you're in the market for a new machine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's worth noting that this machine does not have FireWire 400 ports so you will need a FireWire 800 to 400 adapter in order to use FireWire 400 equipment with it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/design.html&quot;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Conclusion&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is interesting to note how Apple seems to be separating its professional lines from its consumer lines. The new graphics chips in the MacBooks make them much better for Final Cut Studio but the lack of FireWire now cripples them in that regard. I think this is deliberate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's nothing here to make pro users sit up and take notice but if you're in the market for a new MacBook Pro, you'll benefit from the speed bump and the (hopefully) more rugged design due to the new one-piece construction of the base.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Blu-ray unfortunately wasn't a feature in these new machines but then again, OS X 10.5.6 wasn't released either and there's no way they could introduce Blu-ray drives without OS support. But it does complicate the issue because if Apple were to, for example, release OS X 10.5.6 in two weeks with Blu-ray support in the OS, their laptop line would probably not be updated for another 3-4 months, whereas they could have just waited if Blu-ray support was just around the corner. I'm sure Apple must be working on this somewhere in their facility but when it will materialize remains to be seen. The next big event is Macworld in January so fingers crossed it will appear then.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Edit:&lt;/b&gt; One thing I didn't realize at first is that Apple is ONLY offering the MacBook Pro in a glossy screen configuration - the matte option previously offered is no longer present. The thing about glossy screens is that when calibrated properly, they are fully capable of reproducing accurate colors &lt;i&gt;in a perfect environment&lt;/i&gt;. The gloss on the screen tends to reflect the environment which makes it virtually useless for professional work in most environments. I'm sure a third-party will create a matte screen cover for the MacBook Pro but for a machine supposedly targeted at professionals, they really shouldn't have to. This is disappointing.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:27:22 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/new_laptops_and_cinema_displays.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blu-ray coming soon to the Mac?</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/bluray_coming_soon_to_the_mac.html</link>
      <description>I'm not normally one to believe rumors but a lot of Apple rumors have recently proven to be correct (Apple insider reckons Apple may be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/10/06/apple_mellowing_its_tone_on_leaks.html&quot;&gt;softening its stance&lt;/a&gt; on leaks). Here are the reasons why I think Blu-ray may be coming soon to the Mac.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Kevin Rose, founder of Digg, made &lt;a href=&quot;http://kevinrose.com/blogg/2008/8/23/new-ipods-coming-very-soon.html&quot;&gt;correct iPod predictions&lt;/a&gt; (including leaked photos) in August of this year. He also made accurate predictions about iTunes 8, such as the Genius bar and several other features. This is clearly a man with inside information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, around the same time he predicted that OS X 10.5.6 (we're on 10.5.5 now so that's the very next version) will have Blu-ray support built into the OS. Given his track record, there could well be substance in that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Apple announced this week that it is holding a press event this Tuesday October 14th. As you can see from the invitation below (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/10/09/apple-announces-october-14-notebook-event-in-cupertino#&quot;&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;) it is clearly related to notebooks. Apple wouldn't make a big deal about a minor speed bump so this must be a significant redesign. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/applenotebookevent081009.jpg&quot; width=&quot;300&quot; /&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. Kevin Rose dropped another rumor on Friday. He &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edibleapple.com/kevin-rose-drops-macbook-blu-ray-rumor-at-live-diggnation-event/&quot;&gt;claimed&lt;/a&gt; that Apple's press event this Tuesday will reveal laptops with Blu-ray drives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. AppleInsider claims it can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/10/11/apple_dumping_intel_chipsets_for_nvidias_in_new_macbooks.html&quot;&gt;confirm&lt;/a&gt; that Apple will be doing away with integrated Intel graphics for the MacBook line and using NVIDIA's MCP79 instead. This has a lot of nice features but the most significant is the integrated GeForce 9300 / 9400 chips on the motherboard. As well as supporting Open CL (the ability to use the graphics processor for regular computing tasks) in advance for OS X Snow Leopard, these chips offer full Blu-ray acceleration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok, that last one could well be coincidence but I think there's lots to suggest that Apple is moving towards Blu-ray. People have been claiming that Apple will skip Blu-ray altogether and concentrate on their iTunes rental business but Apple is on the Blu-ray board. Why would they be on the board if they were determined not to use Blu-ray at all? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other people seem to be shocked by the rumor, claiming that Apple would never introduce something so soon. Well, firstly, it's not shocking at all because a lot of new laptops have Blu-ray drives nowadays and secondly, this is the company that bucked the trend by killing off the floppy drive that is STILL present in PCs to this day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess we'll find out on Tuesday.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:31:54 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/bluray_coming_soon_to_the_mac.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After Effects CS4 to drop PowerPC support</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/after_effects_cs4_to_drop_powerpc_support.html</link>
      <description>There's a post on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.adobe.com/keyframes/2008/08/after_effects_cs4_mac_powerpc.html&quot;&gt;Keyframes&lt;/a&gt; blog (the official Adobe blog of the AE product manager, Michael Coleman) stating that due to limited time and resources, they have decided to drop PowerPC support in After Effects CS4 in favor of adding new features for Intel users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;By focusing on Intel Macs, we save a huge amount of engineering and testing time. This means that we will be able to complete more features for a larger group of customers and deliver the best release possible. Plus, some CS4 technology is so new that it never existed on PowerPC Macs. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So After Effects CS3 is the last Universal Binary version so if you still have a PPC Mac, you'll have to buy it before the new one goes on sale (which is a bit tricky because a release date hasn't been announced). It should be noted that this only applies to After Effects and not Photoshop or the other apps but it's obvious that they will all go that way eventually.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't see this as a major issue as the number of Intel users is currently very large and will get even larger by the time CS4 is released. It's a shame for people with old PPC machines still kicking around (me) though, and it's reducing the resale value of the older machines. Universal Binaries were such a great idea but to companies who also develop for Windows and have very large codebases, it unfortunately makes more sense to make Intel-only versions.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 02:10:23 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/after_effects_cs4_to_drop_powerpc_support.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Third party Mac Pro Blu-ray drives</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/third_party_mac_pro_bluray_drives.html</link>
      <description>MCE Technologies has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcetech.com/blu-ray/index.html&quot;&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; the availability of an internal 6x Blu-ray drive for the Mac Pro that seamlessly fits into one of the existing bays inside the machine. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/bluray_macpro.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The drive alone is $499 but there is also a version bundled with Roxio Toast 9 for $599. An external version is available for $749. It requires OS X 10.5.2 or higher but no device drivers are needed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Currently the only Mac applications capable of burning Blu-ray movies are Roxio Toast 9 and Adobe Encore CS3, however there are quite a few more available for Windows if you have a Boot Camp partition available.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tuaw.com/2008/07/01/blu-ray-recordable-drive-for-macs/&quot;&gt;TUAW&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:55:31 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/third_party_mac_pro_bluray_drives.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mac Pro and Xserve overclocking tool</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/mac_pro_and_xserve_overclocking_tool.html</link>
      <description>This has been going around the internet for the past couple of days. The German division of ZDNet has released an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.de/enterprise/mac/hardware/0,39038647,39192217-1,00.htm&quot;&gt;overclocking tool&lt;/a&gt; for Mac Pro and Xserve machines running Leopard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Overclocking is the process of artificially increasing the clock speed of your processor and memory in order to make it operate at a faster rate. For example, you could make a 2.8 GHz processor operate at 3.0 GHz without the expense of purchasing a faster CPU. This is very popular in the Windows world, particularly with hardcore video gamers, who have managed to push CPUs beyond 4 GHz. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, increasing the clock rate also increases the power consumption and heat output of the CPU. Upgrading the power supply and increasing the CPU cooling may be necessary - areas that may be tricky with tightly-designed Apple products.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wouldn't advise doing this on a machine that you depend upon every day but it might be useful for a render farm machine where speed is important and the task will be taken up by another machine if there are any crashes or failures. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another final thing to note is that your system performance will only be as fast as the slowest link in the chain. If you overclock your CPU but have a really slow hard disk or not very much RAM, the performance increase will be limited.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All in all though, this is a very useful tool for Mac users as long as they are aware of the dangers and potential issues. It could also encourage more video gamers to switch to the Mac.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:07:46 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/mac_pro_and_xserve_overclocking_tool.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ATI announces Radeon HD 3870 Mac and PC Edition</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/ati_announces_radeon_hd_3870_mac_and_pc_edition.html</link>
      <description>ATI announced the availability of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonhd3800/macpc/index.html&quot;&gt;Radeon HD 3870 Mac and PC Edition&lt;/a&gt; a couple of days ago, shipping in late June for a recommended price of $219.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/blog_imgs/radeon_3870.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This must be welcome news for Mac Pro owners, as the current alternative, the NVIDIA 8800 GT suffers from underwhelming ProApp performance, despite the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/8800gt_performance_improvements_with_10.5.3.html&quot;&gt;recent improvements in the 10.5.3 update&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is a specification comparison:&lt;br&gt;&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;5&quot;&gt;&lt;th align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;Radeon HD 3870&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;8800 GT&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Stream processors&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;320&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;112&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Core clock&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;775 MHz&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;600 MHz&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Memory&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;512 MB&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;512 MB&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Memory interface&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;256-bit&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;256-bit&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Memory bandwidth&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;70 GB/sec&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;57.6 GB/sec&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Price&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;$219&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;$279&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ATI also claims a performance boost in Motion of 30-180%. Barefeats &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.barefeats.com/harper16.html&quot;&gt;found&lt;/a&gt; a 21-41% performance increase over the 8800 GT - for $60 less. It is also compatible with ALL Mac Pros and available from most ATI resellers (the 8800 GT Mac Edition is only available from the Apple Store). This looks to be well worth buying.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:50:16 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/ati_announces_radeon_hd_3870_mac_and_pc_edition.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More WWDC 2008 Day 1 news</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/more_wwdc_2008_day_1_news.html</link>
      <description>Since my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/wwdc_2008.html&quot;&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt; some more things have cropped up:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;3G iPhone&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Not 3G but is actually 3.5G&lt;br&gt;* Thinner at the edges but actually thicker in the middle than its predecessor by 0.7mm and slightly taller (people are making way too big a deal about this)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;AT&amp;T&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Apple no longer gets a cut of the subscription fee from AT&amp;T&lt;br&gt;* No more prescribed service plans - mix and match data and voice&lt;br&gt;* Starting price: $30 a month for unlimited 3G data plus $39.99 a month for voice. Text messages are no longer included so add $5. &lt;b&gt;This means the price increases from $59.99 a month to $74.99 a month.&lt;/b&gt; And that is the &lt;b&gt;base&lt;/b&gt; plan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; As someone who was put off more by the monthly price than the initial cost of the phone, this doesn't make me happy. And this is entirely an AT&amp;T thing because Apple no longer receive money from them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, if you want to use your phone as an iPod Touch with internet access even when you're not near a WiFi point, this is a good thing. Or if you only use voice, for example.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* In-store activation only, no more activating via iTunes&lt;br&gt;* GoPhone service no longer available&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tuaw.com/2008/06/09/atandt-talks-iphone-3g-plans-apps/&quot;&gt;TUAW&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So Apple adds features, AT&amp;T takes features away. Great.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:40:51 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/more_wwdc_2008_day_1_news.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WWDC 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/wwdc_2008.html</link>
      <description>It's Apple's WWDC (Worldwide Developer Conference) today and Steve's keynote just finished. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are the important announcements:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;iPhone firmware update 2.0&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Released in &quot;early July&quot;&lt;br&gt;* Free for iPhone users, $9.95 for iPod Touch users (it's an accounting thing)&lt;br&gt;* Enables applications and the iTunes App Store as previously announced&lt;br&gt;* Enterprise features - Push email, push contacts, push calendar, autodiscovery, global address lookup, remote wipe. &lt;br&gt;* Positional audio (openAL) and fast graphics with OpenGLES.&lt;br&gt;* Word, Excel, PowerPoint and iWork document support&lt;br&gt;* Apps that are 10 MB or less can be downloaded over the cellular network - all others must be downloaded over WiFi or synced from iTunes.&lt;br&gt;* Enterprise users can set up private storefronts and distribute over their intranet. &lt;br&gt;* &lt;b&gt;Push notification for applications&lt;/b&gt; - Instead of running in the background and wasting battery, the iPhone can receive messages and give you notification (alerts, sounds, badges) without needing to have the application running.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;MobileMe&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* The new .Mac&lt;br&gt;* Push email to all devices including iPhones, Macs and Windows PCs&lt;br&gt;* Online calendar and photo album - syncs with iCal and iPhoto. Drag and drop support.&lt;br&gt;* $99 per year, 60 day pre-trial available&lt;br&gt;* Available &quot;early July&quot;&lt;br&gt;* .Mac users get to keep their existing email addresses which will forward to a MobileMe address&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;3G iPhone&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Metal back replaced with glossy plastic&lt;br&gt;* Thinner at the edges&lt;br&gt;* Solid metal buttons&lt;br&gt;* 3.5&quot; screen (same as original)&lt;br&gt;* Flush headphone jack&lt;br&gt;* &quot;Dramatically improved&quot; audio&lt;br&gt;* 10 hours of 2G talk time, 5 hours of 3G talk time, 300 hours standby, 5-6 hours web browsing, 7 hours video, 24 hours audio&lt;br&gt;* Built-in GPS - updates Google Maps live&lt;br&gt;* A LOT of extra countries - 70 new countries this year&lt;br&gt;* Price drop - Was: originally $599 for 8 GB. Now: $199 for 8 GB, $299 for 16 GB, $399 for 32 GB. These are the &lt;b&gt;maximum&lt;/b&gt; prices for every country.&lt;br&gt;* Launches on July 11th (22 countries)&lt;br&gt;* Special edition white version&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve went through the list of (almost) everything that was bad about the original iPhone and improved upon it dramatically. This is a great update.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As always, Engadget has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/09/steve-jobs-keynote-live-from-wwdc-2008/&quot;&gt;the scoop + pictures&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. I've disabled comments because whenever I post anything about the iPhone I get a TON of spam comments.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:03:06 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/wwdc_2008.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>8800GT performance improvements with 10.5.3</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/8800gt_performance_improvements_with_10.5.3.html</link>
      <description>With the recent OS X Leopard &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/mac_os_x_10.5.3_released.html&quot;&gt;10.5.3 upgrade&lt;/a&gt;, several users are reporting performance improvements with the Nvidia 8800GT, which has received bad publicity over its poor ProApp performance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As always, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.barefeats.com/imp04.html&quot;&gt;Barefeats&lt;/a&gt; have benchmarks comparing the card with and without 10.5.3 and against the stock Radeon graphics card. At &lt;a href=&quot;http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7288326&quot;&gt;Apple Discussions&lt;/a&gt;, users have also posted their comparisons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Performance improved significantly with the update but unfortunately not by enough to warrant purchasing it over the stock card. In some cases it was still slightly behind the stock Radeon. But progress is a good thing I suppose.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One poster says:&lt;br&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;...looks like for any real performance - it's going to take another video card entirely.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It looks like that could be the case. I hope that if it comes to that, Apple will do the decent thing and offer an exchange program.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Update:&lt;/b&gt; Some users are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/05/30/mac_os_x_10_5_3_users_grapple_with_bugs_in_adobe_cs3_graphics.html&quot;&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; graphical anomalies and Adobe CS3 suite problems with this patch</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:12:59 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/8800gt_performance_improvements_with_10.5.3.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>256 GB Samsung SSD announced</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/256_gb_samsung_ssd_announced.html</link>
      <description>Yesterday Samsung announced a 2.5in 256 GB solid-state drive (SSD) that will begin shipping in September (1.8 inch version shipping towards the end of the year).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not only does it offer an unprecedented amount of storage space for an SSD but it also offers twice the performance of the 64 GB SSD that ships with the MacBook Air (Samsung's current high-end offering) with 200 MB/s read and 160 MB/s write. Also, the power consumption has dropped to 0.9 watts from 1 watt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt; According to a Q1 2008 report by the semiconductor market research firm iSuppli, the SSD market will grow at an annualized average of 124 percent during the four-year period from 2008 until 2012. iSuppli now projects SSD sales to increase by an additional 35 percent in 2009 over what it projected last year, 51 percent more in 2010, and 89 percent more in 2011, and continue to show dramatic increases in subsequent years.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 64 GB SSD in the MacBook Air costs an extra $999. This is too much in my opinion but a 256 GB drive with twice the performance and lower power consumption for a similar price would definitely make me think twice. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is amazing how quickly these advancements are occurring.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tuaw.com/2008/05/27/256gb-samsung-ssd-heading-for-macbook-air/&quot;&gt;TUAW&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:48:34 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/256_gb_samsung_ssd_announced.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PhotoJojo Final Cut Pro keyboard sleeves</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/photojojo_final_cut_pro_keyboard_sleeves.html</link>
      <description>PhotoJojo is offering &lt;a href=&quot;http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/photo-app-keyboards/&quot;&gt;desktop and laptop keyboard sleeves&lt;/a&gt; for professional apps including Final Cut Pro and After Effects.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog_imgs/photojojo_sleeve.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Applications&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;    * Photoshop&lt;br&gt;    * Aperture (1.5)&lt;br&gt;    * Final Cut Pro/Express&lt;br&gt;    * Pro Tools&lt;br&gt;    * After Effects&lt;br&gt;    * Logic Pro&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Keyboards&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;    * MacBook Pro&lt;br&gt;    * Macbook (Black and White)&lt;br&gt;    * Macbook Air&lt;br&gt;    * Apple Thin Keyboard&lt;br&gt;    * Apple Thin Wireless Keyboard&lt;br&gt;    * Apple Classic Keyboard&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They're rubber and are great at protecting your keyboard as well as being useful. Laptop sleeves are $30 and desktop sleeves are $40 and then $6 for shipping on top of that.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:50:55 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/photojojo_final_cut_pro_keyboard_sleeves.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ATI Radeon 3870 due next month for Mac Pro?</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/ati_radeon_3870_due_next_month_for_mac_pro.html</link>
      <description>AppleInsider is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/04/30/wwdc_extension_radeon_hd_3870_macbook_air_evdo_hack.html&quot;&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; that the ATI Radeon HD 3870 will be due &quot;next month&quot; for both current and legacy Mac Pros.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Details are scarce (and possibly fictional) but the card is said to include 512 MB of DDR4 memory and support for CrossFire mode (linking two cards up to boost graphics performance, usually in video games) within Windows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More importantly for professional users, it provides a mid-range alternative to NVIDIA's GeForce 8800 GT which has ProApp &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/poor_geforce_8800_gt_pro_app_performance.html&quot;&gt;performance issues&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Color users are particularly advised to invest in an ATI card because they support rendering in 10-, 12- and 16-bit modes in addition to NVIDIA's 8- and 32-bit offerings. The NVIDIA card gives you a choice between best and worst, with no in-between values. This can cause problems for people wanting something higher than 8-bit without the massive performance hit when working in 32-bit mode.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At present, the only way to get a mid-range ATI card in your new Mac Pro is to buy one of the ones from the old Mac Pros and update the firmware, although this has the caveat that you have to install it in an older Mac Pro first in order to update it. This news would appear to be the answer to many professional users' prayers, although I hope that Apple introduce a driver update for those that have already upgraded to the 8800 GT.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:50:47 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/ati_radeon_3870_due_next_month_for_mac_pro.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CalDigit SAN announced at NAB</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/caldigit_san_announced_at_nab.html</link>
      <description>I just got this in my inbox courtesy of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lafcpug.org/&quot;&gt;LAFCPUG&lt;/a&gt; mailing list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right now at Digital Rebellion we're running Xserve RAIDs on Xsan 1.4. I love these things but they're loud, they kick out a lot of heat and they're no longer being made. They're still pretty good and they're not out of date yet but I have been looking at alternatives with the future in mind.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CalDigit, famous for their hardware RAID cards, demonstrated such an alternative at NAB. One major departure from the Xserve RAIDs and their replacement, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.promise.com/apple/raid-spec.html&quot;&gt;Promise VTrak E-Class&lt;/a&gt;, is the fact that it does not use 2 or 4 Gb Fibre Channel cables (which cost around $80 per cable) to transmit data. It uses ePCIe which allows it to transmit data at speeds of up to &lt;b&gt;20 Gbps&lt;/b&gt; and allows for very long cable lengths of up to 300m.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With the recent announcement of the entry-level &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/nab_2008_summary.html&quot;&gt;Scarlet camera&lt;/a&gt;, the demand for real-time access to extremely high resolution streams looks set to  increase dramatically and, luckily, the CalDigit SAN has the bandwidth to transfer &lt;b&gt;multiple&lt;/b&gt; 2K streams in real-time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Uniquely, there is also an ePCIe ExpressCard device to allow laptop users (MacBook Pro only) to access the SAN. This is not currently available for fibre-based networks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's nothing on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.caldigit.com/&quot;&gt;their site&lt;/a&gt; as of yet but they have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.creativecow.net/readpost/105/859775&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt; out and it looks like more details will be announced nearer the shipping date, which is currently unknown. This is definitely something I'm keeping my eye on.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:13:42 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/caldigit_san_announced_at_nab.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toshiba plans 512 GB SSDs for 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/toshiba_plans_512_gb_ssds_for_2009.html</link>
      <description>Toshiba has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/04/23/toshiba.512gb.ssd.coming/&quot;&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; that production improvements will allow it to ship 512 GB solid-state drives (SSDs) by 2009. This is a four-fold increase over its 128 GB drives that will start shipping in June.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;The Japanese company estimates that it can reduce the price of making SSDs by as much as 40 to 50 percent every year, resulting in far less expensive drives at greater storage levels. While a 1.8-inch SSD costs 2.9 times as much as its rotating hard disk equivalent, a reliable price drop could reduce the cost to a comparatively reasonable 40 percent premium within the near future. When this will occur is uncertain.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is important because SSDs are small, light, sturdy, less prone to physical failure, more power and heat efficient, and above all - FAST. This surprising rate of growth would mean that by the end of 2009, SSDs will be able to compete with conventional hard disks on space and, not long afterwards, price as well. Current models have some writing problems - namely, a lower maximum number of writes and slower write speeds than conventional hard disks. However, this is increasing all the time and will probably not be an issue in the next couple of years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is an exciting technology for the film industry for both acquisition, post production and, potentially, distribution that I will be keeping my eye on.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:34:10 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/toshiba_plans_512_gb_ssds_for_2009.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NAB 2008 Summary</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/nab_2008_summary.html</link>
      <description>If, like me, you couldn't possibly keep up with all of the goings-on at NAB and decided to wait it out until the end, here is a short summary of the biggest announcements (or the ones most interesting to me anyway) in bitesize form.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;RED&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.red.com/nab/scarlet&quot;&gt;New low-end portable camera Scarlet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;3K&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Around $3000&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Early 2009 release&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;New Mysterium X Sensor&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;1-120 fps (180 fps burst)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;100MB/sec Redcode RAW and RGB recording via dual Compact Flash&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;4.8 inch LCD&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fixed&lt;/b&gt; 8x T2.8 lens&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Auto and manual shooting modes&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Wi-Fi control - this one opens up many possibilities&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/mcurtis/story/red_scarlet_3k_for_3kat_up_to_120fps/&quot;&gt;PVC Scarlet write-up&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.red.com/nab/epic&quot;&gt;New high-end camera Epic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;5K (up from 4K)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;I have heard both $30,000 and $40,000 quoted (up from $17,500)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Early 2009 release&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;New Full-Frame S35 Mysterium X Sensor&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;1-100 fps (up from 1-60 fps)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;100MB/sec (up from 36 MB/sec) Redcode and HDMI recording&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;6 lb body (down from 10 lbs)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;RAW and RGB recording to Red Flash&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Wi-Fi control&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Fully upgradeable&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;You can get a full $17,500 credit for your Red One if you upgrade&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/mcurtis/story/reds_new_epic_camera_5k_raw_100fps_40k/&quot;&gt;PVC Epic write-up&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.red.com/nab/redray&quot;&gt;New playback device RED Ray&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;Early 2009&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;4K in&lt;li&gt;4K, 2K, 1080p, 720p, SD playback&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Can play back content from a regular red laser disc&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Plays native R3D files from Compact Flash&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;4 HD SDI and 4&lt;br&gt;HDMI connections for 4K&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;2 HD SDI and 2 HDMI connections for 2K&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;2 hrs of 4K with 5.1 audio on a regular DVD&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;FireWire 800 for connecting external hard disks or cameras&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Under $1000&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/mcurtis/story/red_ray_2_hour_4k_playback_for_under_1000from_a_burnable_dvd/&quot;&gt;PVC RED Ray write-up&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scott Simmons at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scottsimmons.tv/blog/&quot;&gt;Editblog&lt;/a&gt; has several photographs of the various RED products.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Sony&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.sel.sony.com/assets/NAB_2008/index.html&quot;&gt;PMW-EX3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;Around $13,000&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Uses SxS cards (similar to P2)&lt;li&gt;Removable lens&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;1080i / 720p switchable&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Genlock and timecode inputs&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Shoulder-mounted&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Available late 2008&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;F35&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;S35-sized sensor&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Extensive depth of field controls&lt;li&gt;Greater dynamic range than the F23 (800% more)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;PL lens mount allows regular 35mm film lenses to be used&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Panasonic&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/prModelDetail?storeId=11301&amp;catalogId=13251&amp;itemId=239664&amp;modelNo=Content04102008124337622&amp;surfModel=Content04102008124337622&quot;&gt;P2 Varicams (AJ-HPX3700 and AJ-HPX2700)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;Now uses P2 cards exclusively. 5x P2 slots available on each camera&lt;li&gt;2/3&quot; CCDs&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Full-res 10-bit 4:2:2 AVC Intra-100 recording&lt;li&gt;Variable frame rates in 1-frame increments&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Available fall 2008&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/prModelDetail?storeId=11301&amp;catalogId=13251&amp;itemId=239664&amp;modelNo=Content04102008124337622&amp;surfModel=Content04102008124337622&quot;&gt;AG-HPX170 solid-state camcorder&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;Improves on the successful HVX200&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;1/3&quot; premium-quality CCDs offering increased sensitivity and lower noise&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;13x lens with 28mm wide-angle setting (widest in its class)&lt;li&gt;12-60 fps in 720p-mode&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;P2-only; no tape deck&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Much smaller and lighter than the HVX200&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Available fall 2008&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=132592&quot;&gt;great summary&lt;/a&gt; from DVXUser.com.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/prModelDetail?storeId=11301&amp;catalogId=13251&amp;itemId=239664&amp;modelNo=Content04102008124337622&amp;surfModel=Content04102008124337622&quot;&gt;AJ-HVX200A camcorder&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;Successor to the hugely popular HVX-200&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Incorporates the same lens and CCDs as the new HPX170 but with a tape deck for transitioning from a MiniDV workflow&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=132021&quot;&gt;great review&lt;/a&gt; from DVXUser.com.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/prModelDetail?storeId=11301&amp;catalogId=13251&amp;itemId=239664&amp;modelNo=Content04102008124337622&amp;surfModel=Content04102008124337622&quot;&gt;64 GB P2 card&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;More than 4 hours of DVCPRO footage&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;More than 2 hours of DVCPRO50 or AVC-Intra 50&lt;li&gt;More than 64 minutes of AVC-Intra 100 or DVCPRO HD&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Available fall 2008&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/prModelDetail?storeId=11301&amp;catalogId=13251&amp;itemId=239664&amp;modelNo=Content04102008124337622&amp;surfModel=Content04102008124337622&quot;&gt;AJ-PCD35 ExpressCard P2 drive&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;Allows P2 cards to be used in machines with ExpressCard ports&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Can transfer from up to 5 cards at once&lt;li&gt;Available late 2008&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Imagineer Systems&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mogulvfx.com/&quot;&gt;High-end finishing system mogul&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;Monthly subscription includes hardware, software and maintenance. Annual hardware upgrades&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Open platform allows content sharing and management between multiple applications&lt;li&gt;Editing, compositing and grading integrated to allow you to switch from one to the other without rendering&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Software &quot;plugs in&quot; to the architecture to perform certain tasks such as mogul/roto and mogul/comp with similar interfaces&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;mogul/serve shipping at NAB, other products to be determined&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.studiodaily.com/main/news/headlines/9185.html&quot;&gt;Studio Daily mogul interview&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Matrox&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.matrox.com/video/en/products/mxo2/&quot;&gt;MXO 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;blogul&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;Inputs: Component HD/SD, SDI HD/SD, Embedded SDI audio, Y/C, Composite, XLR audio, RCA audio, AES/EBU, HDMI, Embedded HDMI audio&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Outputs: Component HD/SD, SDI HD/SD, Embedded SDI audio, Y/C, Composite, RCA audio, XLR audio, AES/EBU, HDMI, Embedded HDMI audio, Direct 5.1 surround monitoring &lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;This does not have a DVI output like the MXO so it cannot output to a Cinema Display&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Dynamic RT acceleration and hardware up/downscaling&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Designed for HDMI monitoring with calibration and 1:1 pixel mapping&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Black burst and tri-sync for HD&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;$1600&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Released July 2008&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.matrox.com/video/media/pdf/products/mxo/en_product_selection.pdf&quot;&gt;Differences between the MXO and MXO 2&lt;/a&gt; (PDF)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lfhd.blogspot.com/2008/04/matrox-mxo-2.html&quot;&gt;Shane Ross's write-up&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:59:01 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/nab_2008_summary.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple releases 8800 GT for old Mac Pros</title>
      <link>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/apple_releases_8800_gt_for_old_mac_pros.html</link>
      <description>Early Mac Pro users can now use &lt;a href=&quot;http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/wa/RSLID?s=topSellers&amp;fnode=home/shop_mac/mac_accessories/displays&amp;nplm=MB560Z/A&amp;mco=OTkzNDY&quot;&gt;Apple's NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Upgrade Kit&lt;/a&gt; to add the latest graphics card to their machine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, before you rush off to find your credit card, I would advise holding off for a while until Apple fixes the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/poor_geforce_8800_gt_pro_app_performance.html&quot;&gt;performance issues&lt;/a&gt; with an updated driver (these are normally included in operating system updates but sometimes are offered separately). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if you're planning to use it with Color, you're better off with the original ATI Radeon X1900 XT as the NVIDIA card supports fewer working bit-depths.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But if you're a gamer, you're grand.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:54:30 MDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/apple_releases_8800_gt_for_old_mac_pros.html</guid>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>